SOCIOLOGY STUDENTS TELL US ABOUT LEARNING SOCIOLOGYProject SummaryThe goal of my project was to further our understanding of how sociology majors believe they learn the content and skills of the discipline. In addition, I hoped to gather some data on what learning strategies, behaviors, or attitudes correlate with success in the major. Ultimately, my long-term goal is to apply the findings to improve student learning in Sociology. My project was a multi-method adventure involving four studies: focus group, learning logs, face-to-face interviews, and self-administered questionnaires. Students were located on different places on pathways to learning in terms of surface-deep approaches and novice-expert status. In addition, they reported five types of connections to plug them in to learning: interpersonal, across courses, to the discipline, among related ideas/skills, and to their lives and the “real” world. Finally, correlates of success in the major included being young and white, making internal attributions for success, and reporting high rates of class preparation. Background of the ProjectAbout three years ago, frustrated by what I perceived as inadequate understanding of my discipline and limited sociological expertise by some students in my Sociology senior experience course, it occurred to me that we don't really know how students learn Sociology or develop the sociological imagination, and certainly not from the student's point of view. Thus, the goals of my project were to further our understanding of how sociology majors believe they learn the content and skills of the discipline as well as to gather data on which behaviors or attitudes correlate with success in the major. Past research on learning in Sociology has focused on Introduction to Sociology students and used primarily quantitative methods. Other work has assessed the impact of one specific teaching strategy or assignment. My focus was on sociology senior majors, using primarily qualitative methods, to give the students a voice in telling us how they learn. |
|
Methodologies or EvidenceMy project was a multi-method adventure involving four studies. The work is in the tradition of the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL), and classroom or program action research. The four studies consist of a focus group of nine sociology senior majors from around the United States, an analysis of the learning logs of eight Illinois State sociology seniors, face-to-face, structured interviews with 21 Illinois State sociology seniors, and self-administered questionnaires completed by 54 Illinois State seniors. Details about the research methods can be found in my final project report. Learning Log AnalysisThis small but fairly diverse group of sociology seniors mentioned learning strategies including making connections, finding relevance of the material to their lives, talking with others, working with peers, interacting with faculty, and reviewing and writing. The students discussed strategies that fit current best practices such as collaboration with peers, obtaining feedback, interaction with faculty, time on task, and active learning. Their ideas on making connections and increasing relevance to their own experiences fit with theory and empirical work on placing new learning in the context of students existing knowledge. I attempted to look for similarities or differences in the patterns of responses between stronger and weaker students (operationalized using a group of factors). The main difference between these two groups of students in this study was in the quality of the learning log itself. The stronger students had lengthier learning logs with more detailed reflection. They were more likely to be critical of their own study behaviors and to respond to all the probes, as well as to include additional reflections compared to the other students in the class. Whether these differences simply reflect the fact that the stronger students worked harder than others on the learning log because they do so with all their assignments and/or that something about the process of reflection is related to learning or success is not something that can be answered by the data from this study. Some prior research, however, indicates that when engaging in self-assessment (a form of reflection), stronger students are more accurate in that self-assessment. Questionnaire StudyThe three most commonly mentioned study strategies that work best in Sociology were talking with others about the material, using application and real life examples, and various forms of review and repetition. Greater engagement in the discipline of Sociology was significantly related to greater frequency of six positive study/academic behaviors. In this study, measures of success include Sociology GPA, expected senior thesis grade, level of engagement in the discipline, score on a sociological imagination essay question, and measures combining these variables. Age and race, were each related to four of these measures of success in Sociology with younger students and white students having greater success. Making internal attributions for success in Sociology courses, greater frequency of coming to class well prepared and greater frequency of completing all homework on time were each related to more success in Sociology on three measures of success. Thus, this study is hinting at demographic variables, attitudinal variables, and study behaviors that may distinguish more and less successful Sociology students. |
The Focus Group StudyThese honors students expressed thoughts about learning that often fit with models about learning in the higher education literature including the importance of experiential and active learning, the role of developmental factors, the constructivist nature of knowledge, the need for integrated learning, and the importance of interpersonal relationships. Additionally, the students comments confirmed some of the seven principles of good practice in undergraduate education including cooperation among students, active learning, student-faculty contact, prompt feedback from others, and respect for diverse talents and learning styles. With few exceptions, the responses of these successful students pointed to their ability to acknowledge their role in learning and to make internal attributions for their successes. They also highlighted some particular behaviors that they believed positively impacted their learning including attending class, writing, reading, and reflecting. The strongest theme in this conversation, however, was connections. Students noted the importance to their learning of making connections with peers and faculty, between in- and out-of-class learning opportunities, among courses, over time, between lecture and readings, between the abstract and the concrete, and between material and their lives. Focus Group/Interview Questions |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License This electronic portfolio was created using the KEEP Toolkit™, developed at the |
|